01 · Roasts
Sprint King, Marathon Zero
Every repo in your portfolio was born and mostly finished within a single week. CodeSentinel: 5 days. Non-Manual-Features-ISL: 18 days. Rice-Type-Classification: 1.5 hours. You have the attention span of a Jupyter kernel restart.
90% Notebooks, 0% Reproducibility
Jupyter Notebook accounts for 90% of your codebase bytes, yet not one notebook has tests, CI, or a requirements file that's been battle-tested. You're shipping training logs, not software.
The 42-Second C++ Developer
OrderBook was created and pushed in 42 seconds flat. That's not a commit history, that's a file drag-and-drop. The README claims MIT license but HAS_LICENSE=no — even the license was aspirational.
MCP: The Most Committed Placeholder
MCP: 2 KB, 2 commits, 18 minutes of existence, then silence. Your profile README has 14 commits but MCP couldn't get a third. At least the README is trying.
Solo 100%, Community 0%
soloPct = 100% across every single repo. No collaborators, no external PRs merged in, no issues from users. You're building in a hermetically sealed lab with 5 followers who are probably also your test accounts.
Built using
Zoral
Shadows one worker for a week, then takes over their job with zero extra setup. Behaves exactly like the original.
zoral.ai
02 · Category breakdown
- Impact25% weight56D
- Consistency20% weight65C
- Quality20% weight39F
- Depth15% weight58D
- Breadth10% weight55D
- Community10% weight25F
03 · Stats
365-day commit heatmap
100 active days
Language distribution
- Jupyter Notebook90%
- TypeScript6%
- Python4%
- CSS0%
- HTML0%
- JavaScript0%
04 · Numbers
Owned repos
non-fork
26
Commits
last 12 months
347
Followers
5
Joined GitHub
Nov 2021
05 · Top repos
Harshit-077 /
CodeSentinel
Early-stage multi-agent code review platform (FastAPI backend, Next.js frontend, LangGraph + Groq). 22 commits in 5 days, typed Python, documented README, but no tests, no CI, unmerged conflicts in main files, and zero external adoption.
Harshit-077 /
Non-Manual-Features-in-Indian-Sign-Language
Indian Sign Language recognition pipeline with three neural networks (Expression CNN, Head Movement TCN, ISL Sentence BiLSTM) for real-time inference. Jupyter-based project with training notebooks, ONNX/PyTorch models, and entry-point Python script. No external adoption signals.
Harshit-077 /
floorwisei
Early-stage floor planning web app (TypeScript + React + Vite) with interactive canvas, furniture catalog, and AI chat. Typed, structured, and documented, but thin README (Lovable template), no CI/tests beyond placeholder, nascent adoption.
Harshit-077 /
Multi_Agent
Personal multi-agent RAG system with LangGraph orchestration, vector retrieval, and LLM-based verification. Typed Python with structured agents and FastAPI backend, but lacks README, tests, CI, and is under 2 weeks old with minimal commits.
Harshit-077 /
MilvusRAG
Streamlit-based RAG system for querying PDFs via Milvus + Groq LLM. Has README, hybrid search implementation, and working dual CLI/web UIs, but untyped Python, no tests/CI, single day of development.
Harshit-077 /
Animal-Face
Jupyter Notebook animal face detection project with PyTorch CNN achieving 97% validation accuracy. No tests, CI, or license; educational scope with thin structure and limited adoption signal.
Harshit-077 /
Rice-Type-Classification
Single-week burst of a Jupyter Notebook-based rice classification demo, achieving 98.53% test accuracy on a Kaggle dataset using PyTorch. No tests, CI, or type hints; minimal architectural scope.
Harshit-077 /
Harshit-077
Personal portfolio README with no code artifacts—a professional profile page rather than a functional project. Contains claims of expertise (AI/LLM, FastAPI, RAG) but zero shipped code to validate them. 14 commits in ~10 months suggest minimal ongoing work.
Harshit-077 /
OrderBook
Minimal one-shot dump: ~4 KB C++ order book implementation with 1 commit in 42 seconds (2026-02-27 05:48:50 to 05:49:32). Proof-of-concept code lacks tests, CI, and production rigor despite financial domain claims.
Harshit-077 /
Langchain-Project
Jupyter Notebook collection on LangChain and AI without README, tests, CI, or documentation. No stars, newly created (16 days old), minimal structure observable.
Harshit-077 /
MCP
Empty scaffold with minimal content (2 KB), created and last pushed same day with only 2 commits. No README, tests, CI, or documentation. Appears to be a one-time commit dump or abandoned setup.
06 · Timeline
- Nov 6, 2021Joined GitHub
- May 12, 2025Created Harshit-077
- Feb 27, 2026Created OrderBook — An implementation of a high-performance order book engine that simulates how financial exchanges manage and match buy and sell orders in real time. The system is designed to handle
- Feb 28, 2026Created Rice-Type-Classification
- Mar 2, 2026Created Animal-Face — A computer vision project that detects and processes animal faces from images using deep learning techniques. The system leverages Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) to identify
- Mar 14, 2026Created floorwisei
- Mar 17, 2026Created MCP
- Mar 19, 2026Created MilvusRAG — RAG Document Q&A System (Milvus + LLMs) - Built a Retrieval-Augmented Generation system - Used Milvus + Sentence Transformers for embeddings - Integrated Groq LLM for fast resp
- Mar 20, 2026Created Langchain-Project — Collection of AI and LangChain-based projects, including RAG applications, LLM-powered tools, and document understanding systems built with modern AI frameworks.
- Apr 29, 2026Created Non-Manual-Features-in-Indian-Sign-Language
- May 12, 2026Created Multi_Agent
- May 19, 2026Created CodeSentinel
- May 24, 2026Most recent push to CodeSentinel
07 · Compare
08 · Rubric
How this score was produced
Overall = Σ (category × weight) + gentle top-end curve
Tier thresholds
▸ How the pipeline works
- 01Scrape.Pull every non-fork repo pushed in the last 90 days, plus your contribution calendar, followers, and language byte counts — straight from GitHub's REST & GraphQL APIs.
- 02Triage.A small model reads every repo's file tree + README and picks the 20 files per repo that actually reveal how you code.
- 03Grade each repo. All repos run in parallel through a fast scoring model that reads the picked files and rates each one independently on Impact, Quality, and Depth — with evidence citations.
- 04Aggregate. A larger reasoning model combines the per-repo scores with server-computed stats (heatmap, commit cadence, language entropy, follower count) to produce the 6-dimension profile score + roasts.
- 05Correct.Deterministic server-side checks enforce anchor-scale floors (e.g. a profile with 2,000+ public commits can't score 30 Consistency) and recompute the final verdict.
~90 seconds per profile, ~$0.25 in compute. Total of ~240 files read across your top-12 repos. One rating per GitHub account per day.
▸ Data sources & caveats
- Heatmap & commit totals: GitHub GraphQL
contributionsCollection— covers the last 365 days, includes private repos when the user has opted in (default). - Language %: byte totals across the top 30 owned non-fork repos.
- Curve: a small upward nudge centered on raw score ≈ 70, capping at 100. Prevents specialists from being unfairly penalised for narrow breadth.
- Anchor corrections: when server-measured signals (e.g. privateWorkLikely, multiRepoVolume, follower count) mandate a minimum category score, the aggregation step enforces it. These are signal-conditional, not identity-based floors.