▸ This tool was built by an AI agent from Zoral
← RATE MY GITHUB

#388 — Top 67.6%

Harshit-077

Harshit Sharma

D

README enthusiast

Overall

0.0

/ 100

01 · Roasts

Sprint King, Marathon Zero

Every repo in your portfolio was born and mostly finished within a single week. CodeSentinel: 5 days. Non-Manual-Features-ISL: 18 days. Rice-Type-Classification: 1.5 hours. You have the attention span of a Jupyter kernel restart.

90% Notebooks, 0% Reproducibility

Jupyter Notebook accounts for 90% of your codebase bytes, yet not one notebook has tests, CI, or a requirements file that's been battle-tested. You're shipping training logs, not software.

The 42-Second C++ Developer

OrderBook was created and pushed in 42 seconds flat. That's not a commit history, that's a file drag-and-drop. The README claims MIT license but HAS_LICENSE=no — even the license was aspirational.

MCP: The Most Committed Placeholder

MCP: 2 KB, 2 commits, 18 minutes of existence, then silence. Your profile README has 14 commits but MCP couldn't get a third. At least the README is trying.

Solo 100%, Community 0%

soloPct = 100% across every single repo. No collaborators, no external PRs merged in, no issues from users. You're building in a hermetically sealed lab with 5 followers who are probably also your test accounts.

Built using

Zoral

Shadows one worker for a week, then takes over their job with zero extra setup. Behaves exactly like the original.

zoral.ai

02 · Category breakdown

  • Impact
    25% weight
    56D
  • Consistency
    20% weight
    65C
  • Quality
    20% weight
    39F
  • Depth
    15% weight
    58D
  • Breadth
    10% weight
    55D
  • Community
    10% weight
    25F

03 · Stats

365-day commit heatmap

100 active days

Less
More

Language distribution

6 langs
  • Jupyter Notebook90%
  • TypeScript6%
  • Python4%
  • CSS0%
  • HTML0%
  • JavaScript0%

04 · Numbers

Owned repos

non-fork

26

Commits

last 12 months

347

Followers

5

Joined GitHub

Nov 2021

05 · Top repos

Harshit-077 /

CodeSentinel

38/100

Early-stage multi-agent code review platform (FastAPI backend, Next.js frontend, LangGraph + Groq). 22 commits in 5 days, typed Python, documented README, but no tests, no CI, unmerged conflicts in main files, and zero external adoption.

I25Q50D35
README
Python210d ago

Harshit-077 /

Non-Manual-Features-in-Indian-Sign-Language

37/100

Indian Sign Language recognition pipeline with three neural networks (Expression CNN, Head Movement TCN, ISL Sentence BiLSTM) for real-time inference. Jupyter-based project with training notebooks, ONNX/PyTorch models, and entry-point Python script. No external adoption signals.

I25Q50D35
READMETests
Jupyter Notebook017d ago

Harshit-077 /

floorwisei

37/100

Early-stage floor planning web app (TypeScript + React + Vite) with interactive canvas, furniture catalog, and AI chat. Typed, structured, and documented, but thin README (Lovable template), no CI/tests beyond placeholder, nascent adoption.

I25Q50D35
READMETestsTyped
TypeScript02mo ago

Harshit-077 /

Multi_Agent

35/100

Personal multi-agent RAG system with LangGraph orchestration, vector retrieval, and LLM-based verification. Typed Python with structured agents and FastAPI backend, but lacks README, tests, CI, and is under 2 weeks old with minimal commits.

I25Q45D35
Python019d ago

Harshit-077 /

MilvusRAG

32/100

Streamlit-based RAG system for querying PDFs via Milvus + Groq LLM. Has README, hybrid search implementation, and working dual CLI/web UIs, but untyped Python, no tests/CI, single day of development.

I25Q50D20
README
Python12mo ago

Harshit-077 /

Animal-Face

25/100

Jupyter Notebook animal face detection project with PyTorch CNN achieving 97% validation accuracy. No tests, CI, or license; educational scope with thin structure and limited adoption signal.

I15Q35D25
README
Jupyter Notebook02mo ago

Harshit-077 /

Rice-Type-Classification

25/100

Single-week burst of a Jupyter Notebook-based rice classification demo, achieving 98.53% test accuracy on a Kaggle dataset using PyTorch. No tests, CI, or type hints; minimal architectural scope.

I15Q40D20
README
Jupyter Notebook03mo ago

Harshit-077 /

Harshit-077

20/100

Personal portfolio README with no code artifacts—a professional profile page rather than a functional project. Contains claims of expertise (AI/LLM, FastAPI, RAG) but zero shipped code to validate them. 14 commits in ~10 months suggest minimal ongoing work.

I15Q25D20
README
Unknown02mo ago

Harshit-077 /

OrderBook

20/100

Minimal one-shot dump: ~4 KB C++ order book implementation with 1 commit in 42 seconds (2026-02-27 05:48:50 to 05:49:32). Proof-of-concept code lacks tests, CI, and production rigor despite financial domain claims.

I15Q40D5
README
C++03mo ago

Harshit-077 /

Langchain-Project

13/100

Jupyter Notebook collection on LangChain and AI without README, tests, CI, or documentation. No stars, newly created (16 days old), minimal structure observable.

I5Q10D25
Jupyter Notebook01mo ago

Harshit-077 /

MCP

5/100

Empty scaffold with minimal content (2 KB), created and last pushed same day with only 2 commits. No README, tests, CI, or documentation. Appears to be a one-time commit dump or abandoned setup.

I5Q10D5
Python02mo ago

06 · Timeline

  1. Nov 6, 2021
    Joined GitHub
  2. May 12, 2025
    Created Harshit-077
  3. Feb 27, 2026
    Created OrderBook — An implementation of a high-performance order book engine that simulates how financial exchanges manage and match buy and sell orders in real time. The system is designed to handle
  4. Feb 28, 2026
    Created Rice-Type-Classification
  5. Mar 2, 2026
    Created Animal-Face — A computer vision project that detects and processes animal faces from images using deep learning techniques. The system leverages Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) to identify
  6. Mar 14, 2026
    Created floorwisei
  7. Mar 17, 2026
    Created MCP
  8. Mar 19, 2026
    Created MilvusRAG — RAG Document Q&A System (Milvus + LLMs) - Built a Retrieval-Augmented Generation system - Used Milvus + Sentence Transformers for embeddings - Integrated Groq LLM for fast resp
  9. Mar 20, 2026
    Created Langchain-Project — Collection of AI and LangChain-based projects, including RAG applications, LLM-powered tools, and document understanding systems built with modern AI frameworks.
  10. Apr 29, 2026
    Created Non-Manual-Features-in-Indian-Sign-Language
  11. May 12, 2026
    Created Multi_Agent
  12. May 19, 2026
    Created CodeSentinel
  13. May 24, 2026
    Most recent push to CodeSentinel

07 · Compare

github.com/
Harshit-077 · 6dmedian coder

08 · Rubric

How this score was produced

Overall = Σ (category × weight) + gentle top-end curve

CategoryWeightScoreContrib.
Raw total51.5
Top-end curve+3.0
Final overall54.5

Tier thresholds

S90100Mass-producing humansA8089Ship machineB7079Solid engineerC6069Getting thereD4059README enthusiastF039GitHub tourist
▸ How the pipeline works
  1. 01Scrape.Pull every non-fork repo pushed in the last 90 days, plus your contribution calendar, followers, and language byte counts — straight from GitHub's REST & GraphQL APIs.
  2. 02Triage.A small model reads every repo's file tree + README and picks the 20 files per repo that actually reveal how you code.
  3. 03Grade each repo. All repos run in parallel through a fast scoring model that reads the picked files and rates each one independently on Impact, Quality, and Depth — with evidence citations.
  4. 04Aggregate. A larger reasoning model combines the per-repo scores with server-computed stats (heatmap, commit cadence, language entropy, follower count) to produce the 6-dimension profile score + roasts.
  5. 05Correct.Deterministic server-side checks enforce anchor-scale floors (e.g. a profile with 2,000+ public commits can't score 30 Consistency) and recompute the final verdict.

~90 seconds per profile, ~$0.25 in compute. Total of ~240 files read across your top-12 repos. One rating per GitHub account per day.

▸ Data sources & caveats
  • Heatmap & commit totals: GitHub GraphQL contributionsCollection — covers the last 365 days, includes private repos when the user has opted in (default).
  • Language %: byte totals across the top 30 owned non-fork repos.
  • Curve: a small upward nudge centered on raw score ≈ 70, capping at 100. Prevents specialists from being unfairly penalised for narrow breadth.
  • Anchor corrections: when server-measured signals (e.g. privateWorkLikely, multiRepoVolume, follower count) mandate a minimum category score, the aggregation step enforces it. These are signal-conditional, not identity-based floors.
Harshit-077 · 54.5/100 — Rate My GitHub