▸ This tool was built by an AI agent from Zoral
← RATE MY GITHUB

#525 — Top 69.7%

Rezanikmanesh-79

Reza Nikmanesh

D

README enthusiast

Overall

0.0

/ 100

01 · Roasts

Docker, meet test suite

gym-program, Karamoozi, and django_dr_eskandari can orchestrate containers, but their test and CI coverage is essentially a ghost story.

Tutorial archive energy

telegram_bot weighs 22,560 KB, yet sampled core/main.py is largely commented experiments rather than a focused bot.

One-shot speedrun

The prime checker and keygen utility each show 2 sampled commits and same-day development windows: shipped fast, then vanished.

Security plot twist

Karamoozi hard-codes DEBUG=True and a django-insecure secret; keygen-clude-flare writes private keys with NoEncryption().

Built using

Zoral

Shadows one worker for a week, then takes over their job with zero extra setup. Behaves exactly like the original.

zoral.ai

02 · Category breakdown

  • Impact
    25% weight
    56D
  • Consistency
    20% weight
    60C
  • Quality
    20% weight
    37F
  • Depth
    15% weight
    55D
  • Breadth
    10% weight
    65C
  • Community
    10% weight
    50D

03 · Stats

365-day commit heatmap

38 active days

Less
More

Language distribution

6 langs
  • Jupyter Notebook37%
  • HTML27%
  • Python20%
  • JavaScript10%
  • CSS5%
  • C++1%

04 · Numbers

Owned repos

non-fork

20

Commits

last 12 months

113

Followers

13

Joined GitHub

Sep 2024

05 · Top repos

Rezanikmanesh-79 /

django_dr_eskandari

43/100

A substantial but low-adoption Django repository combining social networking, blog, and shop implementations, with Docker documentation and domain models but limited verification and inconsistent polish.

I25Q52D50
README
Python41mo ago

Rezanikmanesh-79 /

gym-program

34/100

A small Django gym-management application with accounts, trainer/member workflows, workout plans, ticketing, and Docker deployment, but limited adoption and no documentation, tests, CI, or license.

I22Q45D35
Python229d ago

Rezanikmanesh-79 /

auto-whatsapp-GROUP-ender

34/100

A small, early-stage Python/PyQt6 and Playwright WhatsApp group automation tool with GUI CRUD, scanning, categorization, and sending workflows, but no documentation, tests, CI, or typed-language classification.

I25Q40D35
HTML11mo ago

Rezanikmanesh-79 /

Karamoozi

32/100

A small Django/OpenAI storefront chatbot with Playwright product scraping and Docker setup; it shows useful implementation scope but little public adoption, documentation, testing, or delivery automation.

I20Q35D40
Python21mo ago

Rezanikmanesh-79 /

telegram_bot

32/100

A 22,560 KB Python Telegram-bot learning repository with tests, Apache-2.0 licensing, and dependency pinning, but the sampled core/main.py is predominantly commented tutorial experiments rather than a focused production bot.

I20Q40D50
READMETests
Python11mo ago

Rezanikmanesh-79 /

funn-class

28/100

Small educational Python repository demonstrating decorators, class methods, properties, and static methods; it has a minimal README and Apache-2.0 license but no tests, CI, typed code, or evidence of external adoption.

I20Q30D35
README
Python21mo ago

Rezanikmanesh-79 /

learn-some-html-and-css

28/100

A small Persian cafe landing page with responsive HTML/CSS, menu, contact and reservation forms, plus a separate homework exercise; it is functional-looking but undocumented and lacks tests, CI, and typed code.

I20Q30D35
HTML11mo ago

Rezanikmanesh-79 /

Rezanikmanesh-79

20/100

A polished GitHub profile README documenting backend, Linux, networking, and security interests, but the repository contains no demonstrated software, tests, CI, license, or adoption beyond 4 stars.

I20Q20D20
README
Unknown42mo ago

Rezanikmanesh-79 /

keygen-clude-flare

20/100

A compact single-file Python utility that automates Cloudflare DNS-01 Let's Encrypt certificate issuance for one hardcoded domain, but has minimal repository hygiene and no demonstrated adoption or sustained development.

I20Q30D5
Python22mo ago

Rezanikmanesh-79 /

build-a-prime-number-checker-module

15/100

A small JavaScript CommonJS module exporting a basic primality check, with minimal packaging but no documentation, tests, CI, or evidence of adoption.

I15Q25D5
JavaScript014d ago

06 · Timeline

  1. Sep 24, 2024
    Joined GitHub
  2. Jun 27, 2025
    Created django_dr_eskandari
  3. Jun 30, 2025
    Created Karamoozi
  4. Jul 26, 2025
    Created Rezanikmanesh-79
  5. Sep 10, 2025
    Created funn-class
  6. Feb 9, 2026
    Created telegram_bot
  7. Apr 24, 2026
    Created learn-some-html-and-css
  8. Jun 23, 2026
    Created keygen-clude-flare
  9. Jul 30, 2026
    Created gym-program
  10. Aug 20, 2026
    Created auto-whatsapp-GROUP-ender
  11. Sep 6, 2026
    Created build-a-prime-number-checker-module
  12. Sep 6, 2026
    Most recent push to build-a-prime-number-checker-module

07 · Compare

github.com/
Rezanikmanesh-79 · 6dmedian coder

08 · Rubric

How this score was produced

Overall = Σ (category × weight) + gentle top-end curve

CategoryWeightScoreContrib.
Raw total53.1
Top-end curve+3.4
Final overall56.5

Tier thresholds

S90100Mass-producing humansA8089Ship machineB7079Solid engineerC6069Getting thereD4059README enthusiastF039GitHub tourist
▸ How the pipeline works
  1. 01Scrape.Pull every non-fork repo pushed in the last 90 days, plus your contribution calendar, followers, and language byte counts — straight from GitHub's REST & GraphQL APIs.
  2. 02Triage.A small model reads every repo's file tree + README and picks the 20 files per repo that actually reveal how you code.
  3. 03Grade each repo. All repos run in parallel through a fast scoring model that reads the picked files and rates each one independently on Impact, Quality, and Depth — with evidence citations.
  4. 04Aggregate. A larger reasoning model combines the per-repo scores with server-computed stats (heatmap, commit cadence, language entropy, follower count) to produce the 6-dimension profile score + roasts.
  5. 05Correct.Deterministic server-side checks enforce anchor-scale floors (e.g. a profile with 2,000+ public commits can't score 30 Consistency) and recompute the final verdict.

~90 seconds per profile, ~$0.25 in compute. Total of ~240 files read across your top-12 repos. One rating per GitHub account per day.

▸ Data sources & caveats
  • Heatmap & commit totals: GitHub GraphQL contributionsCollection — covers the last 365 days, includes private repos when the user has opted in (default).
  • Language %: byte totals across the top 30 owned non-fork repos.
  • Curve: a small upward nudge centered on raw score ≈ 70, capping at 100. Prevents specialists from being unfairly penalised for narrow breadth.
  • Anchor corrections: when server-measured signals (e.g. privateWorkLikely, multiRepoVolume, follower count) mandate a minimum category score, the aggregation step enforces it. These are signal-conditional, not identity-based floors.
Rezanikmanesh-79 · 56.5/100 — Rate My GitHub