▸ This tool was built by an AI agent from Zoral
← RATE MY GITHUB

#216 — Top 82.0%

VeeraSaiJoshik

Joshik(Jo) Unnam

C

Getting there

Overall

0.0

/ 100

01 · Roasts

Ghost Committer

totalCommitsYear = 0 on the public heatmap — 52 weeks of solid white. Either you're doing all your work in private repos or your keyboard takes more breaks than you do.

Burst-and-Ghost Engineer

radio_temp: 28 commits in 3 days. Recall: 24 commits in 3 days. AllStateJarvis: 5 commits in 2 days then abandoned. Your entire GitHub is a series of hypomanic weekends followed by radio silence.

80% Notebooks, 0% Tests

Jupyter Notebook is 80% of your codebase and you have exactly one repo with any tests at all. Those aren't codebases — they're lab notebooks you forgot to submit.

0 Followers, 0 Following, 0 PRs

You've been on GitHub since June 2022, built 29 repos, and have literally zero followers, zero following, and zero external PRs. You're developing in a hermetically sealed vacuum.

README Halfway House

OralScan's README ends mid-sentence. AllStateJarvis has no README at all. Recall has ARCHITECTURE.md but no README. You write documentation the way people write grocery lists — halfway through and then you remember you forgot milk.

Built using

Zoral

Shadows one worker for a week, then takes over their job with zero extra setup. Behaves exactly like the original.

zoral.ai

02 · Category breakdown

  • Impact
    25% weight
    48D
  • Consistency
    20% weight
    60C
  • Quality
    20% weight
    72B
  • Depth
    15% weight
    65C
  • Breadth
    10% weight
    65C
  • Community
    10% weight
    25F

03 · Stats

365-day commit heatmap

0 active days

Less
More

Language distribution

7 langs
  • Jupyter Notebook80%
  • Dart11%
  • Python3%
  • C++2%
  • TypeScript2%
  • C1%
  • Other1%

04 · Numbers

Owned repos

non-fork

29

Commits

last 12 months

0

Followers

0

Joined GitHub

Jun 2022

05 · Top repos

VeeraSaiJoshik /

radio_temp

60/100

TypeScript + Python radiology copilot with Electron UI, Gemini Live integration, and Django/FastAPI backend. Typed, tested, CI-free, shipped product with structured architecture spanning 116KB and 28 recent commits.

I40Q75D65
READMETestsTyped
TypeScript02mo ago

VeeraSaiJoshik /

Halo

40/100

Early-stage Flutter desktop trading app with embedded WebView, market data polling, and multi-tab architecture. Untyped Dart with structured codebase, meaningful documentation, and 30+ commits in ~3 weeks but minimal production adoption.

I25Q50D50
README
Dart11mo ago

VeeraSaiJoshik /

Recall

38/100

Early-stage competitive beat-recreation game with TypeScript Next.js frontend, Web Audio sequencer, and Firebase backend. Active development (24/30 commits in past month) with structured codebase but no tests, CI, or production polish. Personal experimental project.

I25Q50D35
Typed
TypeScript11mo ago

VeeraSaiJoshik /

OralScan

35/100

Early-stage oral cancer detection system combining multi-modal ML pipeline (U-Net segmentation, InceptionV3 classification) with cross-platform Flutter mobile app and FastAPI backend. Demonstrates technical scope but lacks production infrastructure, tests, and CI/CD.

I25Q45D35
README
Jupyter Notebook11mo ago

VeeraSaiJoshik /

LLM-Token-Compression-Middleware

33/100

Personal experiment in LLM token optimization using NLP and embeddings. Has README + typed Python, modular structure with 6 optimizer strategies (TOON, compression, cache, whitespace, semantic cache, deduplication), but incomplete implementation (hanging CLI code, unfinished async functions), no tests/CI, unpolished.

I25Q40D35
README
Python21mo ago

VeeraSaiJoshik /

AllStateJarvis

20/100

Early-stage competitive programming template library with Textual TUI; project incomplete with no README, tests, CI, or license. Repository shows experimental structure and abandon.

I15Q20D25
Python02mo ago

VeeraSaiJoshik /

Group_Chat_Jeapordy

20/100

Early-stage experimental transformer-based Jeopardy game generator from group chat messages. Python project with minimal documentation, no tests/CI, incomplete implementation (stub returns []), but demonstrates coherent NLP pipeline design across multiple modules.

I15Q25D20
Python02mo ago

06 · Timeline

  1. Jun 9, 2022
    Joined GitHub
  2. Mar 20, 2025
    Created OralScan
  3. Mar 9, 2026
    Created Group_Chat_Jeapordy — A transformer powered platform to automatically create a Jeapordy set based on the Group Chat's wildest and most unhinged messages!
  4. Mar 11, 2026
    Created LLM-Token-Compression-Middleware — Novel caveman adaptation that aims to reduce LLM token bloat while maintaining accuracy using classical NLP methods ensuring free and fast compression.
  5. Mar 12, 2026
    Created radio_temp
  6. Mar 30, 2026
    Created AllStateJarvis
  7. Apr 3, 2026
    Created Recall
  8. Apr 6, 2026
    Created Halo — The browser for day traders
  9. Apr 28, 2026
    Most recent push to Halo

07 · Compare

github.com/
VeeraSaiJoshik · 6dmedian coder

08 · Rubric

How this score was produced

Overall = Σ (category × weight) + gentle top-end curve

CategoryWeightScoreContrib.
Raw total57.1
Top-end curve+4.3
Final overall61.4

Tier thresholds

S90100Mass-producing humansA8089Ship machineB7079Solid engineerC6069Getting thereD4059README enthusiastF039GitHub tourist
▸ How the pipeline works
  1. 01Scrape.Pull every non-fork repo pushed in the last 90 days, plus your contribution calendar, followers, and language byte counts — straight from GitHub's REST & GraphQL APIs.
  2. 02Triage.A small model reads every repo's file tree + README and picks the 20 files per repo that actually reveal how you code.
  3. 03Grade each repo. All repos run in parallel through a fast scoring model that reads the picked files and rates each one independently on Impact, Quality, and Depth — with evidence citations.
  4. 04Aggregate. A larger reasoning model combines the per-repo scores with server-computed stats (heatmap, commit cadence, language entropy, follower count) to produce the 6-dimension profile score + roasts.
  5. 05Correct.Deterministic server-side checks enforce anchor-scale floors (e.g. a profile with 2,000+ public commits can't score 30 Consistency) and recompute the final verdict.

~90 seconds per profile, ~$0.25 in compute. Total of ~240 files read across your top-12 repos. One rating per GitHub account per day.

▸ Data sources & caveats
  • Heatmap & commit totals: GitHub GraphQL contributionsCollection — covers the last 365 days, includes private repos when the user has opted in (default).
  • Language %: byte totals across the top 30 owned non-fork repos.
  • Curve: a small upward nudge centered on raw score ≈ 70, capping at 100. Prevents specialists from being unfairly penalised for narrow breadth.
  • Anchor corrections: when server-measured signals (e.g. privateWorkLikely, multiRepoVolume, follower count) mandate a minimum category score, the aggregation step enforces it. These are signal-conditional, not identity-based floors.
VeeraSaiJoshik · 61.4/100 — Rate My GitHub