01 · Roasts
READMEs Are a Myth
Of 12 repos, 3 have zero documentation at all, and the one that does have a README (android_device_tecno_LJ6) describes the wrong device entirely. POVA 5 LH7n is not LJ6, my guy.
Quantity Over Everything
123 public repos, 2,257 commits in a year, and your most-starred project (GrayRavens-GKI, 7 stars) is 53 KB of metadata with no actual source code. Volume isn't the same as substance.
The One-Day Sprint Champion
twrp_device_infinix_X6728: 30 commits, all in a single day. android_device_tecno_KJ5-kernel: 2 commits, 2 days. android_vendor_tecno_KJ5: 2 commits, 1 day. You're speed-running device trees.
CI/Tests: The Forbidden Arts
Zero repos out of 12 have CI. Zero have tests. You're building Linux kernels and Android HALs for production devices with absolutely no automated validation. Brave or reckless — unclear.
98% C, 1% Everything Else
Your language distribution reads like a cry for help: 98% C, 1% Assembly, and then a rounding error of Shell/Python/Perl. The domainGuess is 'systems' — no kidding.
Built using
Zoral
Shadows one worker for a week, then takes over their job with zero extra setup. Behaves exactly like the original.
zoral.ai
02 · Category breakdown
- Impact25% weight62C
- Consistency20% weight95S
- Quality20% weight38F
- Depth15% weight58D
- Breadth10% weight30F
- Community10% weight55D
03 · Stats
365-day commit heatmap
358 active days
Language distribution
- C98%
- Assembly1%
- Makefile0%
- Shell0%
- Python0%
- Perl0%
- Other1%
04 · Numbers
Owned repos
non-fork
57
Commits
last 12 months
2,257
Followers
23
Joined GitHub
Jun 2024
05 · Top repos
XTENSEI /
android_device_infinix_X6711
Android device tree for Infinix NOTE 30 5G with typed Makefiles, structured config directories, and comprehensive hardware documentation covering SoC, CPU, camera, and display specs.
XTENSEI /
twrp_device_infinix_X6840
TWRP device tree for Infinix SMART 20 (MT6768): untyped C++ configs in structured tree form, barebones README, 22 recent commits over ~2 months.
XTENSEI /
twrp_device_tecno_LJ6
TWRP device tree for Tecno POVA 7 4G—a specialized, single-device recovery project with working implementation but limited scope and zero adoption signals. Typed language (C++), structured layout, meaningful README, but niche use case.
XTENSEI /
android_device_tecno_KJ5
Device tree for TECNO Spark 20 (KJ5) supporting LineageOS, with structured Makefile configuration, hardware integration, and proper documentation of device specs and build process.
XTENSEI /
android_device_tecno_LJ6
Android device tree for TECNO POVA 7 (LJ6) with comprehensive hardware configuration, minimal public adoption (1 star), created and last pushed 2026-06-21 within hours.
XTENSEI /
kernel_common_5.10
Linux kernel fork (5.10) with minimal visibility (3 stars); massive codebase (~2GB) but undocumented architecture, no tests/CI, no clear license. Appears to be a personal/experimental kernel variant without upstream contribution visibility.
XTENSEI /
android_device_infinix_X6711-kernel
Prebuilt kernel tree for Infinix X6711 device (69 MB), 5.10.y GKI-based on MT6833 chipset. Has minimal README and .gitignore but no tests, CI, license, or structured documentation. Limited adoption (0 stars/forks/watchers) suggests experimental/personal device support project.
XTENSEI /
twrp_device_tecno_CL7
TWRP device configuration for TECNO CAMON 30 5G (mt6855). Minimal 1-day burst: 15 commits in ~1 hour, sparse README, no tests/CI. Well-structured device tree files (BoardConfig.mk, device.mk) with complete partition/boot configs but limited scope.
XTENSEI /
twrp_device_infinix_X6728
TWRP device tree configuration for Infinix X6728 smartphone, with 30 commits over ~1 day. No README, tests, CI, or license. Minimal scope—configuration files and HAL stubs only, no substantial custom code.
XTENSEI /
GrayRavens-GKI
Small kernel release repository with minimal documentation and no code artifacts. 7 stars, 53 KB size, 24 of 30 recent commits but lacks substance, tests, CI, typing, or structured code.
XTENSEI /
android_device_tecno_KJ5-kernel
Android kernel tree dump for TECNO Spark 20 with minimal documentation, no tests, no CI, and only 2 commits in 2 days—a scaffold with no meaningful engagement signals.
XTENSEI /
android_vendor_tecno_KJ5
Device vendor tree dump for TECNO Spark 20 with no documentation, tests, CI, or license. 423 MB of build artifacts with minimal commits (2 of last 30) and no README or structured documentation.
06 · Timeline
- Jun 28, 2024Joined GitHub
- Dec 27, 2025Created GrayRavens-GKI — Gray Ravens GKI releases
- Jan 31, 2026Created twrp_device_tecno_LJ6 — Tecno POVA 7 4G PBRP RECOVERY TREE
- Mar 10, 2026Created android_device_infinix_X6711 — Initial Device Tree for Infinix NOTE 30 5G (X6711)
- Mar 12, 2026Created android_device_infinix_X6711-kernel — Kernel Tree for Infinix-X6711
- Apr 20, 2026Created twrp_device_infinix_X6840 — TWRP Device tree for Infinix SMART 20 ( X6840 )
- May 5, 2026Created kernel_common_5.10 — GrayRavens Zenithed Common Kernel Source
- May 27, 2026Created android_device_tecno_KJ5 — Device tree for TECNO Spark 20 (KJ5)
- May 28, 2026Created android_device_tecno_KJ5-kernel — Kernel Tree for TECNO Spark 20 (KJ5)
- May 29, 2026Created android_vendor_tecno_KJ5 — Vendor Tree for TECNO Spark 20 ( KJ5 )
- Jun 10, 2026Created twrp_device_tecno_CL7 — TECNO CAMON 30 5G PBRP
- Jun 19, 2026Created twrp_device_infinix_X6728 — TWRP device tree for Infinix HOT 60i.
- Jun 21, 2026Created android_device_tecno_LJ6 — TECNO POVA 7 (LJ6) Device Tree
- Jun 26, 2026Most recent push to kernel_common_5.10
07 · Compare
08 · Rubric
How this score was produced
Overall = Σ (category × weight) + gentle top-end curve
Tier thresholds
▸ How the pipeline works
- 01Scrape.Pull every non-fork repo pushed in the last 90 days, plus your contribution calendar, followers, and language byte counts — straight from GitHub's REST & GraphQL APIs.
- 02Triage.A small model reads every repo's file tree + README and picks the 20 files per repo that actually reveal how you code.
- 03Grade each repo. All repos run in parallel through a fast scoring model that reads the picked files and rates each one independently on Impact, Quality, and Depth — with evidence citations.
- 04Aggregate. A larger reasoning model combines the per-repo scores with server-computed stats (heatmap, commit cadence, language entropy, follower count) to produce the 6-dimension profile score + roasts.
- 05Correct.Deterministic server-side checks enforce anchor-scale floors (e.g. a profile with 2,000+ public commits can't score 30 Consistency) and recompute the final verdict.
~90 seconds per profile, ~$0.25 in compute. Total of ~240 files read across your top-12 repos. One rating per GitHub account per day.
▸ Data sources & caveats
- Heatmap & commit totals: GitHub GraphQL
contributionsCollection— covers the last 365 days, includes private repos when the user has opted in (default). - Language %: byte totals across the top 30 owned non-fork repos.
- Curve: a small upward nudge centered on raw score ≈ 70, capping at 100. Prevents specialists from being unfairly penalised for narrow breadth.
- Anchor corrections: when server-measured signals (e.g. privateWorkLikely, multiRepoVolume, follower count) mandate a minimum category score, the aggregation step enforces it. These are signal-conditional, not identity-based floors.