▸ This tool was built by an AI agent from Zoral
← RATE MY GITHUB

#139 — Top 88.4%

adithya11sci

ADITHYA S

C

Getting there

Overall

0.0

/ 100

01 · Roasts

Sprint King, Ghost Town

9+ repos, 3 total stars, 0 forks. autoops_ai has a full ARCHITECTURE.md, SYSTEM_DESIGN.md, STATUS.md, and exactly 1 star — from what appears to be the author. You document better than you deploy.

13-Minute Monorepo

ai_education: Next.js + Hono + Durable Objects + AI tutor + VR classroom + proctoring — all scaffolded in 13 literal minutes across 5 commits. The README promises 14 features; the code delivers a truncated interview.ts function.

The Same-Day Repo Pattern

speech_to_speech was created and last pushed the same day, 42 minutes apart. speech_assistent got 8 days. agentic_cicd got 2. You're incubating ideas faster than they can compile.

No Tests, No CI, No Problem (Apparently)

11 of 12 repos have no tests. 10 of 12 have no CI. The one exception (autoops_ai) gets a CI badge and you still shipped it 5 weeks ago with 0 forks. The quality pipeline is in DESIGN.md, not .github/workflows.

Mock Data in Production Claims

agentic_cicd's github.go has FetchPipelineLogs returning a hardcoded string and CreatePullRequest silently creating an Issue instead. The README says 'production-grade autonomous pipeline repair.' These are not the same thing.

Built using

Zoral

Shadows one worker for a week, then takes over their job with zero extra setup. Behaves exactly like the original.

zoral.ai

02 · Category breakdown

  • Impact
    25% weight
    62C
  • Consistency
    20% weight
    60C
  • Quality
    20% weight
    57D
  • Depth
    15% weight
    55D
  • Breadth
    10% weight
    80A
  • Community
    10% weight
    55D

03 · Stats

365-day commit heatmap

58 active days

Less
More

Language distribution

7 langs
  • TypeScript30%
  • JavaScript27%
  • Python25%
  • CSS15%
  • HTML1%
  • PowerShell1%
  • Other1%

04 · Numbers

Owned repos

non-fork

26

Commits

last 12 months

211

Followers

11

Joined GitHub

Sep 2023

05 · Top repos

adithya11sci /

autoops_ai

48/100

TypeScript multi-agent DevOps AI system with LangGraph orchestration, risk assessment, and command validation. Typed, documented with ARCHITECTURE.md, has tests and CI. Early-stage prototype (1 star, created March 2026) with ambitious scope but nascent adoption.

I25Q60D50
READMETestsCITyped
TypeScript11mo ago

adithya11sci /

synapt.ai_agentic_rag

45/100

Standalone agentic RAG system for Indian IT company financials combining LLM tool routing, vector search, structured data queries, and web search—well-documented but unshipped/zero adoption with no tests or CI.

I25Q60D50
README
Python01mo ago

adithya11sci /

movie_ticket_bookings

43/100

MERN movie booking system with atomic seat locking, concurrent booking prevention, and admin controls. Well-documented with design files; no tests or CI. ~18.5 MB codebase built over ~55 days with structured backend architecture.

I25Q50D55
README
JavaScript02mo ago

adithya11sci /

agentic_cicd

38/100

Early-stage agentic CI/CD system in Go with multi-agent orchestration (Monitor, RootCause, Repair, Governance, PR agents) for autonomous pipeline repair. Typed, documented README, structured modular layout (cmd/, internal/agents/, internal/services/), but very new (2 days old), no tests, no CI, lacks production-grade e

I25Q50D35
READMETyped
Go02mo ago

adithya11sci /

inter_view

37/100

Personal project: 3D animated interview coach with React+Three.js frontend, Node/FastAPI backend. Typed JavaScript, documented README, structured codebase (23.5 MB, ~10k LOC estimated), but minimal adoption (1 star, no external engagement).

I25Q50D35
README
JavaScript12mo ago

adithya11sci /

ai_chat_bot_for_csv

36/100

Early-stage Python RAG chatbot for CSV analysis using FastAPI, FAISS, and Groq LLM. Typed with structured layout, good documentation, but minimal stars/adoption and thin test coverage.

I25Q50D35
README
Python13mo ago

adithya11sci /

railway_track_management_system

33/100

Early-stage multi-agent railway AI system with comprehensive documentation (README, ARCHITECTURE.md, design.md, docs/) and untyped Python code; 9 commits over ~3 months, zero stars, no tests/CI/license.

I25Q35D40
README
Python02mo ago

adithya11sci /

speech_to_speech

30/100

Voice avatar system with ASR→LLM→TTS pipeline. Has architecture docs (design.md, ARCHITECTURE.md, STATUS.md) and documented roadmap, but created today with minimal commits (4 of last 30), untyped Python, no tests or CI, no license. Early-stage experimental project.

I25Q45D20
README
Python02mo ago

adithya11sci /

ai_education

28/100

Fresh monorepo for AI-powered educational platform with Next.js frontend + Hono backend. Typed, structured, and documented—but extremely early-stage (5 commits in 13 minutes, created 2026-03-20) with zero adoption signals.

I15Q50D20
READMETyped
TypeScript02mo ago

adithya11sci /

speech_assistent

23/100

Early-stage conversational AI avatar project with lip-sync pipeline (Groq LLM + Wav2Lip). 134 KB codebase, 6 commits in 8 days, documentation present but no tests/CI; untyped Python with minimal source samples.

I15Q35D20
README
Python03mo ago

adithya11sci /

adithya11sci

10/100

Empty personal profile repo with only a README. No source code, tests, CI, or meaningful project output—just a self-introduction and tech stack badges.

I5Q15D10
README
Unknown03mo ago

adithya11sci /

agentic-demo-target

7/100

Empty scaffold created 2026-03-15 with only CI workflow, no code, no README, no documentation. Single commit representing initial repo setup.

I5Q10D5
CI
Python02mo ago

06 · Timeline

  1. Sep 16, 2023
    Joined GitHub
  2. Dec 17, 2025
    Created railway_track_management_system
  3. Jan 19, 2026
    Created adithya11sci
  4. Jan 28, 2026
    Created inter_view
  5. Feb 2, 2026
    Created movie_ticket_bookings
  6. Feb 18, 2026
    Created ai_chat_bot_for_csv
  7. Feb 25, 2026
    Created speech_assistent
  8. Mar 11, 2026
    Created speech_to_speech
  9. Mar 14, 2026
    Created agentic_cicd
  10. Mar 15, 2026
    Created agentic-demo-target
  11. Mar 20, 2026
    Created ai_education
  12. Mar 31, 2026
    Created autoops_ai
  13. Apr 20, 2026
    Created synapt.ai_agentic_rag
  14. May 4, 2026
    Most recent push to autoops_ai

07 · Compare

github.com/
adithya11sci · 6dmedian coder

08 · Rubric

How this score was produced

Overall = Σ (category × weight) + gentle top-end curve

CategoryWeightScoreContrib.
Raw total60.6
Top-end curve+5.1
Final overall65.7

Tier thresholds

S90100Mass-producing humansA8089Ship machineB7079Solid engineerC6069Getting thereD4059README enthusiastF039GitHub tourist
▸ How the pipeline works
  1. 01Scrape.Pull every non-fork repo pushed in the last 90 days, plus your contribution calendar, followers, and language byte counts — straight from GitHub's REST & GraphQL APIs.
  2. 02Triage.A small model reads every repo's file tree + README and picks the 20 files per repo that actually reveal how you code.
  3. 03Grade each repo. All repos run in parallel through a fast scoring model that reads the picked files and rates each one independently on Impact, Quality, and Depth — with evidence citations.
  4. 04Aggregate. A larger reasoning model combines the per-repo scores with server-computed stats (heatmap, commit cadence, language entropy, follower count) to produce the 6-dimension profile score + roasts.
  5. 05Correct.Deterministic server-side checks enforce anchor-scale floors (e.g. a profile with 2,000+ public commits can't score 30 Consistency) and recompute the final verdict.

~90 seconds per profile, ~$0.25 in compute. Total of ~240 files read across your top-12 repos. One rating per GitHub account per day.

▸ Data sources & caveats
  • Heatmap & commit totals: GitHub GraphQL contributionsCollection — covers the last 365 days, includes private repos when the user has opted in (default).
  • Language %: byte totals across the top 30 owned non-fork repos.
  • Curve: a small upward nudge centered on raw score ≈ 70, capping at 100. Prevents specialists from being unfairly penalised for narrow breadth.
  • Anchor corrections: when server-measured signals (e.g. privateWorkLikely, multiRepoVolume, follower count) mandate a minimum category score, the aggregation step enforces it. These are signal-conditional, not identity-based floors.
adithya11sci · 65.7/100 — Rate My GitHub