▸ This tool was built by an AI agent from Zoral
← RATE MY GITHUB

#236 — Top 80.3%

calebjubal

BB9Kairo

C

Getting there

Overall

0.0

/ 100

01 · Roasts

The 1-Hour MVP Factory

louder-assignment: 7 commits in 60 minutes. vision-agent-hack: 13 commits in 3 hours. HRMS-Lite: 6 commits in 10 hours. Your development philosophy appears to be 'ship it before the adrenaline wears off, never return.'

90% Python, 0% Tests

Python is 90% of your codebase and exactly 1 of your 10 scored repos has a test suite—and that one is written in Julia. Your primary language is your most untested language.

The Heatmap Black Hole

Your activity heatmap has ~22 consecutive weeks of near-zero commits (weeks 11–32). That's roughly half a year where GitHub forgot you existed. The recent sprint in weeks 39–44 is appreciated, but the hibernation is hard to unsee.

meta-rl-status200: A Study in Ambition

You created a repo called meta-rl-status200, pushed 1 commit, wrote a README that says only 'meta-rl-status200', and walked away. At least the HTTP status code is aspirational.

106 Repos, 42 Total Stars

With 106 public repos you're averaging 0.4 stars each. The profile README has more stars (2) than most of your actual projects. Quantity is not the strategy it appears to be.

Built using

Zoral

Shadows one worker for a week, then takes over their job with zero extra setup. Behaves exactly like the original.

zoral.ai

02 · Category breakdown

  • Impact
    25% weight
    56D
  • Consistency
    20% weight
    55D
  • Quality
    20% weight
    72B
  • Depth
    15% weight
    50D
  • Breadth
    10% weight
    45D
  • Community
    10% weight
    50D

03 · Stats

365-day commit heatmap

67 active days

Less
More

Language distribution

6 langs
  • Python90%
  • C++4%
  • Cython2%
  • HTML2%
  • Jupyter Notebook1%
  • C1%

04 · Numbers

Owned repos

non-fork

41

Commits

last 12 months

183

Followers

39

Joined GitHub

Jun 2021

05 · Top repos

calebjubal /

AhoCorasick.jl

50/100

Polished Julia implementation of Aho-Corasick algorithm with comprehensive tests, CI, and clear documentation. Early-stage personal project with no adoption signals yet.

I25Q75D50
READMETestsCI
Julia01mo ago

calebjubal /

louder-assignment

38/100

Fresh full-stack SaaS app (Next.js + FastAPI) for AI-driven event planning. Typed, documented, deployed, but nascent—created 2026-03-20 with only 7 commits in 1 hour. No tests, no CI, no stars/forks. Demonstrates competent architecture but pre-portfolio maturity.

I25Q55D35
READMETyped
TypeScript02mo ago

calebjubal /

vision-agent-hack

37/100

Personal AI agent project using Vision Agents framework to provide a Joey Tribbiani-themed frontend development assistant. 741 KB codebase with structured Python setup, comprehensive README, and multimodal integration (Gemini, ElevenLabs, Deepgram), but no tests, CI, or type hints despite Python being the primary langu

I25Q50D35
README
Python03mo ago

calebjubal /

resume-latex-updater

35/100

TypeScript Next.js resume editor with LaTeX generation, Clerk auth, and Neon database. Clean architecture, structured components, and type-safe API routes, but nascent project (created 2026-03-26, 10 commits in 2 hours).

I25Q60D20
READMETyped
TypeScript02mo ago

calebjubal /

HRMS-Lite

32/100

A lightweight HRMS project built with Flask backend + React 19 frontend. Has README, typed Pydantic schemas, clean API structure, but lacks tests, CI, license, and is only 56 KB with 6 commits in a single day—experimental stage.

I20Q40D35
README
JavaScript03mo ago

calebjubal /

multi-doc-rag

28/100

Early-stage RAG chatbot built with Streamlit, LangChain, and Cerebras API. Minimal codebase (12 KB) with working PDF processing and conversational retrieval, but lacks tests, CI, and substantive documentation. Created 14 days ago with 8 commits showing initial development burst.

I20Q35D30
README
Python03mo ago

calebjubal /

IITD_Feb26_AAIPL

21/100

Experimental MCQ generation pipeline using local LLMs (Phi4) to create/answer questions. Unfinished, minimal README, no tests/CI/license. Created Feb 2026, 22 KB with ~8 commits in 1 hour. Lacks documentation and production-ready structure.

I15Q30D20
README
Python13mo ago

calebjubal /

calebjubal

8/100

GitHub profile config repo with only a decorative README. 8 KB, 2 stars, no code, no tests, no CI, no license. Pure cosmetic portfolio piece with no executable substance.

I5Q15D5
README
Unknown24mo ago

calebjubal /

django-test

7/100

Bare scaffold repo with minimal content (4 KB), created 2026-01-29 with only 3 commits in 2 minutes. README is title-only, no source code sampled, no tests, no meaningful documentation despite HAS_README=yes flag.

I5Q10D5
READMECI
Unknown04mo ago

calebjubal /

meta-rl-status200

5/100

Empty scaffold repo with only a bare README title. Created moments ago (2026-04-02) with 1 commit. No code, tests, CI, license, or meaningful documentation. Placeholder status.

I5Q10D5
README
Unknown02mo ago

06 · Timeline

  1. Jun 3, 2021
    Joined GitHub
  2. Jun 5, 2021
    Created calebjubal — Config files for my GitHub profile.
  3. Jan 22, 2026
    Created multi-doc-rag
  4. Jan 29, 2026
    Created django-test
  5. Feb 6, 2026
    Created HRMS-Lite
  6. Feb 9, 2026
    Created AhoCorasick.jl
  7. Feb 15, 2026
    Created IITD_Feb26_AAIPL
  8. Mar 1, 2026
    Created vision-agent-hack
  9. Mar 20, 2026
    Created louder-assignment
  10. Mar 26, 2026
    Created resume-latex-updater
  11. Apr 2, 2026
    Created meta-rl-status200
  12. Apr 21, 2026
    Most recent push to AhoCorasick.jl

07 · Compare

github.com/
calebjubal · 6dmedian coder

08 · Rubric

How this score was produced

Overall = Σ (category × weight) + gentle top-end curve

CategoryWeightScoreContrib.
Raw total56.4
Top-end curve+4.1
Final overall60.5

Tier thresholds

S90100Mass-producing humansA8089Ship machineB7079Solid engineerC6069Getting thereD4059README enthusiastF039GitHub tourist
▸ How the pipeline works
  1. 01Scrape.Pull every non-fork repo pushed in the last 90 days, plus your contribution calendar, followers, and language byte counts — straight from GitHub's REST & GraphQL APIs.
  2. 02Triage.A small model reads every repo's file tree + README and picks the 20 files per repo that actually reveal how you code.
  3. 03Grade each repo. All repos run in parallel through a fast scoring model that reads the picked files and rates each one independently on Impact, Quality, and Depth — with evidence citations.
  4. 04Aggregate. A larger reasoning model combines the per-repo scores with server-computed stats (heatmap, commit cadence, language entropy, follower count) to produce the 6-dimension profile score + roasts.
  5. 05Correct.Deterministic server-side checks enforce anchor-scale floors (e.g. a profile with 2,000+ public commits can't score 30 Consistency) and recompute the final verdict.

~90 seconds per profile, ~$0.25 in compute. Total of ~240 files read across your top-12 repos. One rating per GitHub account per day.

▸ Data sources & caveats
  • Heatmap & commit totals: GitHub GraphQL contributionsCollection — covers the last 365 days, includes private repos when the user has opted in (default).
  • Language %: byte totals across the top 30 owned non-fork repos.
  • Curve: a small upward nudge centered on raw score ≈ 70, capping at 100. Prevents specialists from being unfairly penalised for narrow breadth.
  • Anchor corrections: when server-measured signals (e.g. privateWorkLikely, multiRepoVolume, follower count) mandate a minimum category score, the aggregation step enforces it. These are signal-conditional, not identity-based floors.
calebjubal · 60.5/100 — Rate My GitHub