▸ This tool was built by an AI agent from Zoral
← RATE MY GITHUB

#69 — Top 94.3%

dragon1086

rocky-mun

B

Solid engineer

Overall

0.0

/ 100

01 · Roasts

The 40-Second Repo

worksai-scout was born and abandoned in under a minute (2026-03-07T05:14:13Z → 05:14:52Z). That's not a side project — that's a sneeze with a git init.

90% Python, 0% Variety

langPcts shows Python at 90% across 30 repos. You've found your language soulmate and you're not letting go. Shell (4%) is basically just Python with more regret.

The Burst-Builder

aimesh: 30 hours. rolemesh: 3 days. amp-assistant: 8 days. emergent: 10 days. You generate architectural vision at scale but the commit graph looks like fireworks — bright flash, then silence.

CI Optional, Apparently

8 of 12 repos have no CI pipeline. You've got tests in 6 repos, but half of them are running on vibes and hope. prism-insight has 600 stars and zero automated quality gates.

266 PRs, 25 Followers

You filed 266 pull requests this year but only have 25 followers. You're contributing at senior-engineer volume while the audience is mid-internship. The world just hasn't caught up yet.

Built using

Zoral

Shadows one worker for a week, then takes over their job with zero extra setup. Behaves exactly like the original.

zoral.ai

02 · Category breakdown

  • Impact
    25% weight
    71B
  • Consistency
    20% weight
    65C
  • Quality
    20% weight
    69C
  • Depth
    15% weight
    65C
  • Breadth
    10% weight
    55D
  • Community
    10% weight
    55D

03 · Stats

365-day commit heatmap

152 active days

Less
More

Language distribution

6 langs
  • Python90%
  • Shell4%
  • JavaScript3%
  • TeX1%
  • TypeScript1%
  • HTML1%

04 · Numbers

Owned repos

non-fork

19

Commits

last 12 months

394

Followers

25

Joined GitHub

Aug 2018

05 · Top repos

dragon1086 /

prism-insight

63/100

AI-driven Korean/US stock analysis system with 13+ agents, GPT-5/Claude integration, and live trading deployment. Well-documented multi-language architecture (600 stars), but untyped Python and no CI pipeline limit quality. 9-month trajectory with significant scope justifies depth score despite modest commit history re

I65Q65D50
READMETests
Python60027d ago

dragon1086 /

korea-research-tracker

57/100

Active Korean stock research tracker: Python scrapers + Next.js dashboard auto-tracking ValueFinder & ResearchArum reports with daily price/performance updates. Shipped with CI/CD, TypeScript, structured codebase; lacks tests but has comprehensive architecture docs & substantial code volume.

I45Q68D58
READMECITyped
TypeScript419d ago

dragon1086 /

claude-code-sounds

56/100

Polished Claude Code audio-feedback plugin with 27 hooks, multi-platform support, and comprehensive docs. Typed Python with CI validation, but no test suite.

I40Q72D55
READMECI
Python41mo ago

dragon1086 /

telegram-ai-org

55/100

Multi-agent Telegram orchestration system (AIMesh) with PM coordination, 37KB Python codebase, HAS_README + HAS_TESTS + HAS_CI, structured src/ layout, comprehensive CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md/GEMINI.md documentation, but untyped Python limits quality tier.

I55Q60D50
READMETestsCI
Python01mo ago

dragon1086 /

kospi-kosdaq-stock-server

55/100

MCP server for Korean stock market data with custom KRX authentication client. Has typed Python, structured multi-file layout, meaningful docs, and production-ready OAuth integration via Playwright, but lacks test suite and CI/CD.

I55Q60D50
README
Python712mo ago

dragon1086 /

amp-assistant

53/100

Young multi-agent reasoning framework with novel CSER metric and persona-driven debate. Typed Python (v0.2.0), comprehensive docs, CI/tests present. No license filed; 8 days old, 30 recent commits show sustained burst work. Exported to PyPI but zero GitHub stars/adoption so far.

I35Q68D55
READMETestsCI
Python02mo ago

dragon1086 /

emergent

45/100

Experimental 2-agent LLM debate system with knowledge graph memory, structured around emergence theory. 55kb codebase with typed Python, substantial documentation (README, ARCHITECTURE.md, STATUS.md), and multi-file architecture, but no tests/CI, early-stage adoption (0 stars), and active development limited to 10 days

I25Q55D50
READMETests
Python02mo ago

dragon1086 /

rolemesh

43/100

Early-stage Korean-language AI orchestration tool for non-developers. Features role-based agent routing, CLI installer, integration manager, contract system, and circuit-breaker aware provider selection. Active 3-day burst but untyped Python.

I25Q55D50
READMETests
Python02mo ago

dragon1086 /

aimesh

42/100

Young Telegram-based multi-agent orchestration system with Python async architecture, structured task decomposition, and tmux integration. Early-stage but coherent project with clear architectural vision across bus, PM agents, and memory layers.

I25Q60D35
READMETests
Python02mo ago

dragon1086 /

llm-wiki

40/100

Educational implementation of Karpathy's LLM wiki pattern using Claude CLI to auto-compile markdown sources into Obsidian vault. Typed Python CLI with structured ingest/query/lint modules, clear schema docs, but early-stage (15 days, 5 commits sampled, no tests/CI).

I25Q60D35
README
Python01mo ago

dragon1086 /

claude-skills

35/100

Niche skill for Claude Code/Codex users that scans tool environments and suggests workflows. Typed documentation and clear architecture, but limited ecosystem adoption (10 stars, minimal external engagement).

I25Q50D35
README
Shell101mo ago

dragon1086 /

worksai-scout

12/100

Minimal scaffold project with documentation outline but no implementation. Created and pushed within ~40 seconds on 2026-03-07; only 1 of last 30 commits shown. No code files, tests, CI, or license.

I5Q25D5
README
Unknown02mo ago

06 · Timeline

  1. Aug 26, 2018
    Joined GitHub
  2. Feb 14, 2025
    Created kospi-kosdaq-stock-server — An MCP server that provides KOSPI/KOSDAQ stock data using FastMCP
  3. Aug 15, 2025
    Created prism-insight — AI-based stock analysis and trading system
  4. Jan 31, 2026
    Created claude-skills — Curated skills for Claude Code power users - tool selection, workflow optimization, and productivity
  5. Feb 28, 2026
    Created emergent — Two AIs building something neither planned
  6. Mar 2, 2026
    Created amp-assistant
  7. Mar 7, 2026
    Created rolemesh
  8. Mar 7, 2026
    Created worksai-scout
  9. Mar 10, 2026
    Created aimesh
  10. Mar 10, 2026
    Created telegram-ai-org
  11. Mar 26, 2026
    Created korea-research-tracker — valuefinder-tracker
  12. Apr 6, 2026
    Created llm-wiki — implements of karpathy's llm wiki
  13. Apr 9, 2026
    Created claude-code-sounds — Your Claude Code sessions, now with a soundtrack. Zero config, full hook coverage.
  14. May 15, 2026
    Most recent push to korea-research-tracker

07 · Compare

github.com/
dragon1086 · 6dmedian coder

08 · Rubric

How this score was produced

Overall = Σ (category × weight) + gentle top-end curve

CategoryWeightScoreContrib.
Raw total65.3
Top-end curve+5.7
Final overall71.0

Tier thresholds

S90100Mass-producing humansA8089Ship machineB7079Solid engineerC6069Getting thereD4059README enthusiastF039GitHub tourist
▸ How the pipeline works
  1. 01Scrape.Pull every non-fork repo pushed in the last 90 days, plus your contribution calendar, followers, and language byte counts — straight from GitHub's REST & GraphQL APIs.
  2. 02Triage.A small model reads every repo's file tree + README and picks the 20 files per repo that actually reveal how you code.
  3. 03Grade each repo. All repos run in parallel through a fast scoring model that reads the picked files and rates each one independently on Impact, Quality, and Depth — with evidence citations.
  4. 04Aggregate. A larger reasoning model combines the per-repo scores with server-computed stats (heatmap, commit cadence, language entropy, follower count) to produce the 6-dimension profile score + roasts.
  5. 05Correct.Deterministic server-side checks enforce anchor-scale floors (e.g. a profile with 2,000+ public commits can't score 30 Consistency) and recompute the final verdict.

~90 seconds per profile, ~$0.25 in compute. Total of ~240 files read across your top-12 repos. One rating per GitHub account per day.

▸ Data sources & caveats
  • Heatmap & commit totals: GitHub GraphQL contributionsCollection — covers the last 365 days, includes private repos when the user has opted in (default).
  • Language %: byte totals across the top 30 owned non-fork repos.
  • Curve: a small upward nudge centered on raw score ≈ 70, capping at 100. Prevents specialists from being unfairly penalised for narrow breadth.
  • Anchor corrections: when server-measured signals (e.g. privateWorkLikely, multiRepoVolume, follower count) mandate a minimum category score, the aggregation step enforces it. These are signal-conditional, not identity-based floors.
dragon1086 · 71.0/100 — Rate My GitHub