▸ This tool was built by an AI agent from Zoral
← RATE MY GITHUB

#142 — Top 88.5%

finn-abel

Finn Abel

C

Getting there

Overall

0.0

/ 100

01 · Roasts

One-Week Wonder Factory

SnapNStore, MiniDB, MiniEditor, MiniContainer, MiniGit, MiniSniffer — all built in under a week each. Incredible velocity, zero stars. You're shipping to a stadium with no audience.

CI Allergic

Out of 9 scored repos, exactly ONE has CI. SnapNStore has it and it's genuinely impressive. The other eight are running on vibes and -Werror. That's not a pipeline, that's optimism.

C Monoculture

80% of your codebase is C. You've built a database, a container runtime, a VCS, a packet sniffer, and a text editor — all in C. Respect. Also: have you considered touching grass in another language?

Account Is 11 Months Old and Already Exhausting

Joined July 2025, 289 commits, 9+ projects. You've built more infrastructure in less than a year than most engineers touch in five. Unfortunately GitHub still shows 4 followers and 0 stars.

31 PRs, 0 Issues

You opened 31 pull requests this year and zero issues. Either every repo you contribute to has perfect code, or you're just merging your own branches and calling them PRs. The heatmap suggests the latter.

Built using

Zoral

Shadows one worker for a week, then takes over their job with zero extra setup. Behaves exactly like the original.

zoral.ai

02 · Category breakdown

  • Impact
    25% weight
    62C
  • Consistency
    20% weight
    65C
  • Quality
    20% weight
    72B
  • Depth
    15% weight
    65C
  • Breadth
    10% weight
    55D
  • Community
    10% weight
    25F

03 · Stats

365-day commit heatmap

45 active days

Less
More

Language distribution

6 langs
  • C80%
  • Java12%
  • JavaScript6%
  • CSS1%
  • Makefile1%
  • Shell0%

04 · Numbers

Owned repos

non-fork

13

Commits

last 12 months

289

Followers

4

Joined GitHub

Jul 2025

05 · Top repos

finn-abel /

SnapNStore

55/100

SnapNStore: a well-architected, feature-complete local snapshot backup tool in C with comprehensive documentation, full test suite, and robust encryption/compression pipeline. Personal project with no external adoption yet.

I25Q75D65
READMETestsCI
C023d ago

finn-abel /

MiniDB

55/100

Self-contained relational database in C with full SQL pipeline (lexer→parser→binder→planner→executor), B+ tree indexes, WAL recovery, and comprehensive test suite covering storage, execution, transactions, and recovery.

I25Q75D65
READMETests
C01mo ago

finn-abel /

MiniGit

52/100

Educational C11 VCS implementation with core Git features (commits, branches, merges, diffs). Typed, well-tested, documented. Very recent creation (June 2026) with solid architecture but no real-world adoption.

I25Q75D50
READMETests
C01mo ago

finn-abel /

MiniContainer

50/100

Educational Linux container runtime in C with CLI, namespaces, cgroups, networking, and port publishing. Minimal adoption but well-architected for learning.

I25Q60D50
READMETests
C01mo ago

finn-abel /

MiniEditor

48/100

Terminal text editor in C11 with clean architecture, undo/redo, syntax highlighting, and structured tests. Early-stage personal project with no external adoption yet.

I25Q60D50
READMETests
C028d ago

finn-abel /

MiniSniffer

48/100

Well-crafted C packet sniffer with libpcap integration, comprehensive filtering, TCP reassembly, and application-layer decoding (HTTP/DNS/TLS). Clean architecture with 20+ test files but limited adoption (0 stars, <6 days old).

I25Q70D50
READMETests
C01mo ago

finn-abel /

bot-trap-server

42/100

Specialized passive bot-observation backend with dual Cloudflare Workers + Node.js architecture, SQLite + D1 storage, IP enrichment, and authenticated dashboard API. Early-stage project (5 days old, 6 commits) addressing niche security use case with clean structure and tests.

I25Q60D35
READMETests
JavaScript01mo ago

finn-abel /

timekeeper

35/100

Internal timekeeping tool built with React, Express, PostgreSQL. Functional full-stack project with proper structure, but unpolished production readiness. No tests, CI, or security hardening. 0 stars; created 3 days ago.

I25Q50D35
README
JavaScript01mo ago

finn-abel /

bot-trap-dashboard

25/100

Fresh (4-day-old) local-only dashboard for bot-trap-server. React+Vite with Tailwind, TanStack Query/Table. Has tests and structured layout; no CI, untyped JS, minimal public adoption (0 stars). Well-intentioned but too new and purpose-scoped to demonstrate sustained shipping.

I15Q40D20
READMETests
JavaScript01mo ago

06 · Timeline

  1. Jul 2, 2025
    Joined GitHub
  2. May 16, 2026
    Created MiniDB — MiniDB: Self-contained relational database built in C
  3. Jun 1, 2026
    Created timekeeper
  4. Jun 8, 2026
    Created MiniSniffer — MiniSniffer: Packet sniffer and network analyzer built in C
  5. Jun 11, 2026
    Created MiniGit — MiniGit: A simple version control system built in C
  6. Jun 13, 2026
    Created bot-trap-server — Hands out bait URLs you hide in GitHub repos and logs what bots reveal when they fetch them.
  7. Jun 13, 2026
    Created bot-trap-dashboard — Dashboard for exploring the bots caught by bot-trap-server.
  8. Jun 17, 2026
    Created MiniContainer — MiniContainer: Simple linux container runtime
  9. Jun 22, 2026
    Created MiniEditor — MiniEditor: Terminal based text editor for C files
  10. Jun 23, 2026
    Created SnapNStore — SnapNStore: A lightweight C project for capturing, organizing, and storing snapshots with a focus on simplicity, speed, and local-first control.
  11. Jun 28, 2026
    Most recent push to SnapNStore

07 · Compare

github.com/
finn-abel · 6dmedian coder

08 · Rubric

How this score was produced

Overall = Σ (category × weight) + gentle top-end curve

CategoryWeightScoreContrib.
Raw total60.6
Top-end curve+5.1
Final overall65.7

Tier thresholds

S90100Mass-producing humansA8089Ship machineB7079Solid engineerC6069Getting thereD4059README enthusiastF039GitHub tourist
▸ How the pipeline works
  1. 01Scrape.Pull every non-fork repo pushed in the last 90 days, plus your contribution calendar, followers, and language byte counts — straight from GitHub's REST & GraphQL APIs.
  2. 02Triage.A small model reads every repo's file tree + README and picks the 20 files per repo that actually reveal how you code.
  3. 03Grade each repo. All repos run in parallel through a fast scoring model that reads the picked files and rates each one independently on Impact, Quality, and Depth — with evidence citations.
  4. 04Aggregate. A larger reasoning model combines the per-repo scores with server-computed stats (heatmap, commit cadence, language entropy, follower count) to produce the 6-dimension profile score + roasts.
  5. 05Correct.Deterministic server-side checks enforce anchor-scale floors (e.g. a profile with 2,000+ public commits can't score 30 Consistency) and recompute the final verdict.

~90 seconds per profile, ~$0.25 in compute. Total of ~240 files read across your top-12 repos. One rating per GitHub account per day.

▸ Data sources & caveats
  • Heatmap & commit totals: GitHub GraphQL contributionsCollection — covers the last 365 days, includes private repos when the user has opted in (default).
  • Language %: byte totals across the top 30 owned non-fork repos.
  • Curve: a small upward nudge centered on raw score ≈ 70, capping at 100. Prevents specialists from being unfairly penalised for narrow breadth.
  • Anchor corrections: when server-measured signals (e.g. privateWorkLikely, multiRepoVolume, follower count) mandate a minimum category score, the aggregation step enforces it. These are signal-conditional, not identity-based floors.
finn-abel · 65.7/100 — Rate My GitHub