▸ This tool was built by an AI agent from Zoral
← RATE MY GITHUB

#192 — Top 89.0%

josephheinz

Joseph Heinz

C

Getting there

Overall

0.0

/ 100

01 · Roasts

CI Collector, Not CI Practitioner

8 repos, 1 has CI. system-monitor has a beautiful multi-OS release workflow, and then you apparently forgot GitHub Actions existed for every single other project. pregnant-cat-futures-game has 50+ tests and no CI — those tests are just vibes.

The License Hoarder (of None)

Multiple public repos, zero licenses on most of them. Legally, nobody can use your cat futures trading game or budget tracker. Congrats on accidentally creating proprietary software.

94% Solo Artist

soloPct = 94. You have 48 PRs this year and 2 followers — the math suggests you're mostly PRing yourself. Your repos have a combined social circle smaller than a group chat.

2-Week Wonders

pregnant-cat-futures-game: 2 weeks. budget-tracker: 5 hours. Life-EOS-App: 18 days. You ship fast but the commit graphs all look like a firework — brilliant burst, then silence. Follow-through is the missing ingredient.

The README Completionist (Everywhere Except josephheinz)

ARCHITECTURE.md, GAME-DESIGN.md, ADRs, STATUS.md across your projects — yet your actual GitHub profile README is literally just a heading that says hi. Peak developer: documents everything except yourself.

Built using

Zoral

Shadows one worker for a week, then takes over their job with zero extra setup. Behaves exactly like the original.

zoral.ai

02 · Category breakdown

  • Impact
    25% weight
    56D
  • Consistency
    20% weight
    65C
  • Quality
    20% weight
    72B
  • Depth
    15% weight
    65C
  • Breadth
    10% weight
    72B
  • Community
    10% weight
    40D

03 · Stats

365-day commit heatmap

187 active days

Less
More

Language distribution

7 langs
  • TypeScript52%
  • Go20%
  • Svelte9%
  • JavaScript6%
  • PowerShell4%
  • Shell4%
  • Other5%

04 · Numbers

Owned repos

non-fork

15

Commits

last 12 months

1,029

Followers

2

Joined GitHub

Aug 2024

05 · Top repos

josephheinz /

system-monitor

60/100

Native cross-platform system monitor in Go with Fyne UI. Well-structured, typed, tested, and documented with CI/CD. Active indie project with 30 commits over 2 months, professional architecture (234 KB codebase).

I40Q75D65
READMETestsCITyped
Go31mo ago

josephheinz /

pregnant-cat-futures-game

60/100

Typed Next.js + Convex trading-game prototype with a working market engine, settlement system, and full test coverage. Deterministic price simulation, portfolio mechanics, and run-based progression loop are well-architected and documented, but unshipped—no CI, no users, recent-only commits, remains a clever personal ex

I25Q70D50
READMETestsTyped
TypeScript02mo ago

josephheinz /

livestream-site

50/100

TypeScript livestream + Convex + Clerk + Next.js 16 site. Well-documented personal project with clean architecture (ADRs, design specs), tests, typed codebase, structured layout. Zero stars, no external adoption signals.

I25Q75D50
READMETestsTyped
TypeScript02mo ago

josephheinz /

budget-tracker

42/100

A personal finance dashboard built with SvelteKit, Tailwind v4, and D3. Typed, well-documented, multi-page (Overview/Transactions/Budgets), and shipped with CSV import—but brand-new (1 day old), 0 stars, and clearly experimental/portfolio work.

I25Q65D35
READMETyped
Svelte03mo ago

josephheinz /

portfolio

35/100

Portfolio site built with SvelteKit, Tailwind, and custom components. Untyped JavaScript with no tests/CI. Demonstrates basic web dev skills but limited scope and production-readiness.

I25Q45D35
README
JavaScript03mo ago

josephheinz /

Life-EOS-App

33/100

TypeScript template project for Next.js + Clerk + Convex with comprehensive setup documentation. 18-day-old repo with 30 commits, typed language, tests, and multi-document architecture; however, lacks CI, license, and no production adoption signals.

I15Q50D35
READMETestsTyped
TypeScript02mo ago

josephheinz /

Quick-Build

28/100

Next.js + Clerk + Convex starter template with comprehensive setup docs. No source files sampled; Shell language; 0 stars, no tests/CI, minimal commit history (3 of 30), 327 KB total size. Useful template but lacks implementation depth and community validation.

I15Q45D20
READMETyped
Shell03mo ago

josephheinz /

homebrew-tap

12/100

Minimal Homebrew tap scaffold syncing system-monitor releases. No README, tests, CI, or documentation; 6KB, 12 recent commits over ~1 day. Lacks substance for sustained analysis.

I5Q10D20
Ruby01mo ago

josephheinz /

josephheinz

8/100

GitHub profile config repo with minimal content—just a greeting in README. No source files, no meaningful structure, clear one-off scaffold.

I5Q15D5
READMECI
Unknown01mo ago

06 · Timeline

  1. Aug 7, 2024
    Joined GitHub
  2. Dec 9, 2024
    Created josephheinz — Config files for my GitHub profile.
  3. May 21, 2025
    Created portfolio
  4. Jan 18, 2026
    Created Quick-Build — Build your projects faster without worrying about the boring stuff
  5. Jun 2, 2026
    Created system-monitor — Cross-platform native system monitor dashboard written in Go
  6. Jun 6, 2026
    Created budget-tracker
  7. Jun 10, 2026
    Created Life-EOS-App
  8. Jun 25, 2026
    Created pregnant-cat-futures-game
  9. Jul 7, 2026
    Created livestream-site
  10. Aug 3, 2026
    Created homebrew-tap — Homebrew tap for system-monitor (cask synced from josephheinz/system-monitor releases)
  11. Aug 13, 2026
    Most recent push to josephheinz

07 · Compare

github.com/
josephheinz · 6dmedian coder

08 · Rubric

How this score was produced

Overall = Σ (category × weight) + gentle top-end curve

CategoryWeightScoreContrib.
Raw total62.4
Top-end curve+5.4
Final overall67.7

Tier thresholds

S90100Mass-producing humansA8089Ship machineB7079Solid engineerC6069Getting thereD4059README enthusiastF039GitHub tourist
▸ How the pipeline works
  1. 01Scrape.Pull every non-fork repo pushed in the last 90 days, plus your contribution calendar, followers, and language byte counts — straight from GitHub's REST & GraphQL APIs.
  2. 02Triage.A small model reads every repo's file tree + README and picks the 20 files per repo that actually reveal how you code.
  3. 03Grade each repo. All repos run in parallel through a fast scoring model that reads the picked files and rates each one independently on Impact, Quality, and Depth — with evidence citations.
  4. 04Aggregate. A larger reasoning model combines the per-repo scores with server-computed stats (heatmap, commit cadence, language entropy, follower count) to produce the 6-dimension profile score + roasts.
  5. 05Correct.Deterministic server-side checks enforce anchor-scale floors (e.g. a profile with 2,000+ public commits can't score 30 Consistency) and recompute the final verdict.

~90 seconds per profile, ~$0.25 in compute. Total of ~240 files read across your top-12 repos. One rating per GitHub account per day.

▸ Data sources & caveats
  • Heatmap & commit totals: GitHub GraphQL contributionsCollection — covers the last 365 days, includes private repos when the user has opted in (default).
  • Language %: byte totals across the top 30 owned non-fork repos.
  • Curve: a small upward nudge centered on raw score ≈ 70, capping at 100. Prevents specialists from being unfairly penalised for narrow breadth.
  • Anchor corrections: when server-measured signals (e.g. privateWorkLikely, multiRepoVolume, follower count) mandate a minimum category score, the aggregation step enforces it. These are signal-conditional, not identity-based floors.
josephheinz · 67.7/100 — Rate My GitHub