▸ This tool was built by an AI agent from Zoral
← RATE MY GITHUB

#472 — Top 60.5%

lukiod

Mohak

D

README enthusiast

Overall

0.0

/ 100

01 · Roasts

98% Jupyter, 0% Production

Your language breakdown is 98% Jupyter Notebook. You're not building software — you're building slide decks that occasionally run cells. CodeConclave is the only repo that saw actual JavaScript.

AADHAAR: 160 Files, 0 Working Endpoints

The AADHAAR-PULSE-SYSTEM has 160+ Python files, an IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md, and a Streamlit app that is literally half a function. Planning-to-shipping ratio: ∞.

quant-learning: 2 Commits, 3 Minutes, Big Dreams

Your HFT learning repo has 2 commits timestamped 23:25 and 23:28 on the same night. That's not learning — that's a 3-minute existential crisis with a .md extension.

CI? Never Heard of Her

Across 7 repos scored, HAS_CI=yes appears exactly 0 times. GitHub Actions has been sitting there the whole time, free of charge, judging you silently.

CodeConclave Carrying the Whole Roster

12 of your 16 total stars, the only tests, the only license, the only ARCHITECTURE.md — CodeConclave is doing Atlas-level heavy lifting while your other 32 repos take the day off.

Built using

Zoral

Shadows one worker for a week, then takes over their job with zero extra setup. Behaves exactly like the original.

zoral.ai

02 · Category breakdown

  • Impact
    25% weight
    48D
  • Consistency
    20% weight
    55D
  • Quality
    20% weight
    57D
  • Depth
    15% weight
    50D
  • Breadth
    10% weight
    30F
  • Community
    10% weight
    40D

03 · Stats

365-day commit heatmap

114 active days

Less
More

Language distribution

7 langs
  • Jupyter Notebook98%
  • Python1%
  • JavaScript0%
  • Java0%
  • HTML0%
  • Shell0%
  • Other1%

04 · Numbers

Owned repos

non-fork

21

Commits

last 12 months

107

Followers

15

Joined GitHub

May 2021

05 · Top repos

lukiod /

CodeConclave

51/100

A React-based code editor with Monaco integration, terminal (xterm), and Jupyter notebook support. Typed with styled-components, documented, and structured; ships with HAS_README, HAS_TESTS, HAS_LICENSE. ~2.2 MB codebase with multi-layer architecture (auth, editor, file system, code execution). 30 of last 30 commits ov

I45Q60D50
READMETests
JavaScript123mo ago

lukiod /

classification-pipeline

37/100

Image classification pipeline with Hydra config, TensorFlow/Keras CNN, class weighting, and W&B logging. Typed Python, documented structure, but minimal adoption (0 stars), no tests, no CI, experimental scope.

I25Q50D35
README
Python01mo ago

lukiod /

CoderLion

35/100

GitHub PR reviewer agent with FastAPI backend and Next.js frontend using Gemini API; typed Python with multi-agent architecture but lacks tests, CI, and polished documentation.

I25Q45D35
README
Python03mo ago

lukiod /

AADHAAR-PULSE-SYSTEM---UIDAI-HACK

32/100

Jupyter-based UIDAI hackathon project analyzing Aadhaar enrollment patterns. Sized ~80MB with structured src/ modules (anomaly detection, forecasting, preprocessing), but lacks tests, CI, license, and executable delivery. Quality hindered by incomplete implementations, no working example notebooks, and Jupyter-only for

I15Q45D35
README
Jupyter Notebook02mo ago

lukiod /

ecgnet

28/100

Educational ECG classification project built in Jupyter notebooks with deep learning and ML baselines. No tests, CI, license, or type checking. Primarily a coursework artifact with promising results (97.94% CNN accuracy) but minimal structural integrity and production readiness.

I25Q35D25
README
Jupyter Notebook03mo ago

lukiod /

lukiod

13/100

Personal GitHub profile README (59 KB) with no source code, tests, or CI. Contains only social badges and GitHub stats widgets. No meaningful project implementation or documentation.

I5Q15D20
README
Unknown02mo ago

lukiod /

quant-learning

12/100

Personal learning journal/checklist for HFT education created Feb 9, 2026 with only 2 commits in ~3 minutes. Minimal structured content—mostly unchecked checkbox lists and incomplete notes. No code, no tests, no CI, no license.

I5Q25D5
README
Unknown03mo ago

06 · Timeline

  1. May 28, 2021
    Joined GitHub
  2. May 25, 2024
    Created lukiod
  3. Feb 28, 2025
    Created CodeConclave — A powerful, AI-enhanced code editor that supports multiple programming languages with real-time syntax highlighting, intelligent autocompletion, and seamless debugging. Designed fo
  4. Jun 24, 2025
    Created ecgnet — This project focuses on ECG beat classification to distinguish between normal and abnormal heartbeats using deep learning techniques. It involves preprocessing ECG signals, extract
  5. Sep 15, 2025
    Created CoderLion — a code reviewer agent which replaces coderrabbit with a gemini api
  6. Jan 9, 2026
    Created AADHAAR-PULSE-SYSTEM---UIDAI-HACK
  7. Feb 5, 2026
    Created classification-pipeline — This is a default classification pipeline which can be used for testing stuff by adding the data changing the config changing the model
  8. Feb 9, 2026
    Created quant-learning — my weekly learning of quant and notes of it
  9. Apr 26, 2026
    Most recent push to classification-pipeline

07 · Compare

github.com/
lukiod · 6dmedian coder

08 · Rubric

How this score was produced

Overall = Σ (category × weight) + gentle top-end curve

CategoryWeightScoreContrib.
Raw total48.9
Top-end curve+2.4
Final overall51.3

Tier thresholds

S90100Mass-producing humansA8089Ship machineB7079Solid engineerC6069Getting thereD4059README enthusiastF039GitHub tourist
▸ How the pipeline works
  1. 01Scrape.Pull every non-fork repo pushed in the last 90 days, plus your contribution calendar, followers, and language byte counts — straight from GitHub's REST & GraphQL APIs.
  2. 02Triage.A small model reads every repo's file tree + README and picks the 20 files per repo that actually reveal how you code.
  3. 03Grade each repo. All repos run in parallel through a fast scoring model that reads the picked files and rates each one independently on Impact, Quality, and Depth — with evidence citations.
  4. 04Aggregate. A larger reasoning model combines the per-repo scores with server-computed stats (heatmap, commit cadence, language entropy, follower count) to produce the 6-dimension profile score + roasts.
  5. 05Correct.Deterministic server-side checks enforce anchor-scale floors (e.g. a profile with 2,000+ public commits can't score 30 Consistency) and recompute the final verdict.

~90 seconds per profile, ~$0.25 in compute. Total of ~240 files read across your top-12 repos. One rating per GitHub account per day.

▸ Data sources & caveats
  • Heatmap & commit totals: GitHub GraphQL contributionsCollection — covers the last 365 days, includes private repos when the user has opted in (default).
  • Language %: byte totals across the top 30 owned non-fork repos.
  • Curve: a small upward nudge centered on raw score ≈ 70, capping at 100. Prevents specialists from being unfairly penalised for narrow breadth.
  • Anchor corrections: when server-measured signals (e.g. privateWorkLikely, multiRepoVolume, follower count) mandate a minimum category score, the aggregation step enforces it. These are signal-conditional, not identity-based floors.
lukiod · 51.3/100 — Rate My GitHub