▸ This tool was built by an AI agent from Zoral
← RATE MY GITHUB

#956 — Top 19.9%

priyanshu-pathak-555

priyanshu-pathak-555

F

GitHub tourist

Overall

0.0

/ 100

01 · Roasts

The 11-Minute Portfolio

GOOGLE_PLAYSTORE_DATA_ANALYSIS was born and died in 11 minutes across 3 commits. CUSTOMER_CHURN_ANALYSIS took 33 seconds. You're not doing data analysis — you're doing data speedruns.

Password: '12345'

Your ecommerce notebook has the password '12345' hardcoded, and crud-app has secret key 'secret123'. You built an *authentication* app with the digital equivalent of a sticky note on the monitor.

100% Jupyter, 0% Readme

Every byte in your public profile is a Jupyter Notebook, and 9 out of 11 repos have no README whatsoever. GitHub is not your personal NAS — other humans exist.

SQL Typo Bingo

SQL_PROJECT_DATA_CLEANING_AND_EDA has 'information_schemas', 'TABLE_SCHEMAS', 'laptops_backups', and 'select * from laptop' (missing the 's'). You wrote a data *cleaning* project with dirty data *and* dirty SQL.

Commit Velocity: Negative

61 commits in a year across 14 repos averages to 4.3 commits per repo. Your heatmap is 46 completely blank weeks out of 52. The grass on your contribution graph is not just dead — it was never planted.

Built using

Zoral

Shadows one worker for a week, then takes over their job with zero extra setup. Behaves exactly like the original.

zoral.ai

02 · Category breakdown

  • Impact
    25% weight
    18F
  • Consistency
    20% weight
    55D
  • Quality
    20% weight
    23F
  • Depth
    15% weight
    30F
  • Breadth
    10% weight
    30F
  • Community
    10% weight
    25F

03 · Stats

365-day commit heatmap

12 active days

Less
More

Language distribution

4 langs
  • Jupyter Notebook100%
  • Python0%
  • HTML0%
  • CSS0%

04 · Numbers

Owned repos

non-fork

14

Commits

last 12 months

61

Followers

1

Joined GitHub

Sep 2025

05 · Top repos

priyanshu-pathak-555 /

VENDOR_PERFORMANCE_ANALYSIS

27/100

Personal data analysis project using Jupyter notebooks and SQLite to perform vendor performance analysis on beverage inventory, with basic ETL and statistical exploration but minimal documentation and no tests.

I15Q35D30
Jupyter Notebook01mo ago

priyanshu-pathak-555 /

Hotel_booking_data_analysis

25/100

A personal data analysis project analyzing hotel booking cancellations using Jupyter notebooks. Demonstrates basic exploratory data analysis with matplotlib/seaborn visualizations, but lacks tests, CI, typed code, structured layout, and proper documentation for reproducibility. One-shot analysis effort.

I15Q35D25
README
Jupyter Notebook01mo ago

priyanshu-pathak-555 /

crud-app

25/100

Beginner CRUD authentication tutorial project with Flask/SQLite. No tests, CI, or type hints. Basic app demonstrates password hashing and sessions but lacks polish and production readiness. Created and developed over 2 days with 16 commits.

I15Q35D25
README
Python01mo ago

priyanshu-pathak-555 /

MOVIE_RECOMMENDATION_SYSTEM

20/100

Personal educational project: Jupyter-based movie recommender with Streamlit frontend. No README, tests, CI, or license. Single-week development (4 commits in 15 days). Minimal scope and documentation.

I15Q25D20
Jupyter Notebook01mo ago

priyanshu-pathak-555 /

data_validation_project

16/100

Personal data validation learning project with hardcoded paths, no tests, CI, or documentation. Implements basic PAN/email/numeric field validation on CSV data with minimal scope and no reusability.

I15Q25D10
Jupyter Notebook01mo ago

priyanshu-pathak-555 /

ECOMERCE_DATA_ANALYSIS_USING_PANDAS_SQL

15/100

Single-day learning project: Jupyter notebook with 6 basic SQL queries on ecommerce data plus a CSV-to-SQL loader script. No tests, CI, documentation, or version control discipline. Credentials hardcoded and requires manual setup.

I15Q25D5
Jupyter Notebook01mo ago

priyanshu-pathak-555 /

ML_MODEL1

12/100

Minimal handwritten digit recognition project using kNN with Streamlit UI. No docs, tests, CI, or version control hygiene. Single-push experiment with basic implementation.

I5Q25D5
Python02mo ago

priyanshu-pathak-555 /

SQL_PROJECT_DATA_CLEANING_AND_EDA

8/100

Bare SQL learning exercise with two unpolished scripts for laptop data cleaning/EDA. Zero ecosystem presence, no documentation, structure, tests, or CI. Minimal commit activity and completely isolate, unexported work.

I5Q15D5
Unknown01mo ago

priyanshu-pathak-555 /

CUSTOMER_CHURN_ANALYSIS

8/100

Single Jupyter notebook with basic exploratory data analysis on customer churn dataset; no README, no tests, no documentation, one commit in under 1 minute.

I5Q15D5
Jupyter Notebook01mo ago

priyanshu-pathak-555 /

IMAGE_CAPTION_GENERATOR

8/100

Minimal Streamlit app for image captioning with no README, no tests, no CI, and only a single recent commit. Lacks documentation, project structure, and meaningful git history. Appears to be a one-off experiment or homework submission.

I5Q15D5
Jupyter Notebook01mo ago

priyanshu-pathak-555 /

GOOGLE_PLAYSTORE_DATA_ANALYSIS

7/100

Minimal data analysis notebook dump with zero stars, no README, no documentation, no tests, and only 3 commits over 11 minutes. Created and abandoned immediately; shows no sustained work or architectural intent.

I5Q10D5
Jupyter Notebook01mo ago

06 · Timeline

  1. Sep 25, 2025
    Joined GitHub
  2. Oct 15, 2025
    Created Hotel_booking_data_analysis
  3. Oct 15, 2025
    Created VENDOR_PERFORMANCE_ANALYSIS
  4. Mar 29, 2026
    Created ML_MODEL1
  5. Apr 4, 2026
    Created crud-app
  6. Apr 13, 2026
    Created IMAGE_CAPTION_GENERATOR
  7. Apr 13, 2026
    Created MOVIE_RECOMMENDATION_SYSTEM
  8. Apr 14, 2026
    Created CUSTOMER_CHURN_ANALYSIS
  9. Apr 14, 2026
    Created ECOMERCE_DATA_ANALYSIS_USING_PANDAS_SQL
  10. Apr 14, 2026
    Created GOOGLE_PLAYSTORE_DATA_ANALYSIS
  11. Apr 25, 2026
    Created data_validation_project
  12. Apr 25, 2026
    Created SQL_PROJECT_DATA_CLEANING_AND_EDA
  13. Apr 28, 2026
    Most recent push to MOVIE_RECOMMENDATION_SYSTEM

07 · Compare

github.com/
priyanshu-pathak-555 · 6dmedian coder

08 · Rubric

How this score was produced

Overall = Σ (category × weight) + gentle top-end curve

CategoryWeightScoreContrib.
Raw total30.1
Top-end curve+0.2
Final overall30.3

Tier thresholds

S90100Mass-producing humansA8089Ship machineB7079Solid engineerC6069Getting thereD4059README enthusiastF039GitHub tourist
▸ How the pipeline works
  1. 01Scrape.Pull every non-fork repo pushed in the last 90 days, plus your contribution calendar, followers, and language byte counts — straight from GitHub's REST & GraphQL APIs.
  2. 02Triage.A small model reads every repo's file tree + README and picks the 20 files per repo that actually reveal how you code.
  3. 03Grade each repo. All repos run in parallel through a fast scoring model that reads the picked files and rates each one independently on Impact, Quality, and Depth — with evidence citations.
  4. 04Aggregate. A larger reasoning model combines the per-repo scores with server-computed stats (heatmap, commit cadence, language entropy, follower count) to produce the 6-dimension profile score + roasts.
  5. 05Correct.Deterministic server-side checks enforce anchor-scale floors (e.g. a profile with 2,000+ public commits can't score 30 Consistency) and recompute the final verdict.

~90 seconds per profile, ~$0.25 in compute. Total of ~240 files read across your top-12 repos. One rating per GitHub account per day.

▸ Data sources & caveats
  • Heatmap & commit totals: GitHub GraphQL contributionsCollection — covers the last 365 days, includes private repos when the user has opted in (default).
  • Language %: byte totals across the top 30 owned non-fork repos.
  • Curve: a small upward nudge centered on raw score ≈ 70, capping at 100. Prevents specialists from being unfairly penalised for narrow breadth.
  • Anchor corrections: when server-measured signals (e.g. privateWorkLikely, multiRepoVolume, follower count) mandate a minimum category score, the aggregation step enforces it. These are signal-conditional, not identity-based floors.
priyanshu-pathak-555 · 30.3/100 — Rate My GitHub